In all of these comparisons, the D7100 is on the left while the competing camera is on the right. You can see the file name at the top left of each picture, where I indicated the camera name and ISO. Click on the thumbnails below to see the full resolution screen capture.
NIKON D7100 VS. NIKON D7000
Viewing samples at 100%, the D7100 and D7000 look similar to me (DXO gives the D7100 about a 1/10th stop edge). However, I viewed the samples in Photoshop (which has a continuous zoom) at about the same viewing size (with the D7100 at around 80% zoom). I found that at ISO 25,600, the D7100 had a significantly better appearance than the D7000.
ISO 25600 |
D7100 @ 12,800 vs. D7000 @ 6,400 |
ISO 6400 |
ISO 3200 |
ISO 1600 |
NIKON D7100 VS. NIKON D600
As expected, the D7100's high ISO performance is not as good as that of the D600.
Even when I compared the D7100 to the D600 at one stop higher, the D600 still came out slightly ahead. I would estimate that the D600 is about 1.5 stops better than the D7100 at high ISOs.
D7100 @ 12800 vs. D600 @ 25600 |
D7100 @ 6400 vs. D600 @ 12800 |
D7100 @ 3200 vs. D600 @ 6400 |
D7100 @ 1600 vs. D600 @ 3200 |
NIKON D7100 VS. NIKON D700
At ISO 25,600, viewed at the same size (the D7100 is zoomed to approximately 66%), the D7100 looks just as good as the D700. In fact, you can even make the argument that the D7100 looks a little better because the grain of the luminance noise is finer, and in addition, the D7100 preserved some details better. With the Umberto medal in the middle, the lines around the bust are better preserved with the D7100 than the D700.
ISO 25,600 |
The same pattern holds true at ISO 12,800, 6,400, 3,200 and 1,600.
ISO 12,800 |
ISO 6,400 |
ISO 3,200 |
ISO 1600 |
The fact that the D7100 samples look about as good as the D700 samples at the same viewing size is really incredible. The D700's full frame sensor, the same as that of the Nikon D3, has about twice the surface area as the D7100's APS-C sensor, and the D700 was well-regarded for its low noise for many years (indeed, even today).
In fact, the D7100 seems to preserve the smallest details a little better than the D700. For example, if you look at the medal in the top left of these samples (near the red and white cross), there is a blue hatching pattern, which looks more accurate on the D7100 than on the D700. If you look at the Umberto medal as well, in the inscription Milano 1881, the number 8 is legible as such, whereas on the D700 the number 8 looks illegible.
CONCLUSION
The D7100's high ISO performance does not seem very remarkable when viewed against competing cameras at 100%. However, at the same size viewing size, the D7100 shines and can actually offer the same (or even slightly better) performance as the full-frame D700. I invite you to download samples from DPReview (using their studio comparison tool) to draw your own conclusions.
Please note also that this was a studio scene comparison. I noted that the D7100's shadow recovery is not as good as that of the D7000 or D600. It is possible that if the samples required significant shadow recovery, these observations might be different.
RELATED POSTS
Nikon D7100 Hands-On Real World User Review
Importing D7100 Raw Files Into Lightroom
Nikon D7100 Low Light Teaser
Nikon D7100 FAQ and Helpful Links
Nikon D7100 Shadow Recovery
Nikon D7100 Real World Dynamic Range
Nikon D5200 and D7100 Band-Aid: Solutions for Banding
Sample of D7100 banding in a real world shot
Please note also that this was a studio scene comparison. I noted that the D7100's shadow recovery is not as good as that of the D7000 or D600. It is possible that if the samples required significant shadow recovery, these observations might be different.
RELATED POSTS
Nikon D7100 Hands-On Real World User Review
Importing D7100 Raw Files Into Lightroom
Nikon D7100 Low Light Teaser
Nikon D7100 FAQ and Helpful Links
Nikon D7100 Shadow Recovery
Nikon D7100 Real World Dynamic Range
Nikon D5200 and D7100 Band-Aid: Solutions for Banding
Sample of D7100 banding in a real world shot
0 comments:
Post a Comment